Friday, December 20, 2019

Jane Eyre Journal Entries Essay - 1314 Words

Journal Entries Journal Entry #1 â€Å"I was conscious that a moment’s mutiny had already rendered me liable to strange penalties, and, like any other rebel slave, I felt resolved, in my desperation, to go all lengths.† –-- -Chapter 2, page 6 Reaction: Being really young, her sudden decision was a poor choice. Response: She’s still very young, and needs to experience more of life in order to make better decisions. Have logic and not be fooled by only emotions. Explanation: With the allegations she was being accused with she felt like she had nothing to lose, so she fought with no care for the consequences. Journal Entry #2 â€Å"It is not violence that best overcomes hate-nor vengeance that most certainly heals†¦show more content†¦Rochester bestows upon her. She finds him to be teasing and ironic. Response: I feel that Jane needs to live up to her own words of being equal to others even in beauty. She shouldn’t think so little of who she is or what she looks like. Explanation: Mr. Rochester sees Jane in a completely different light than others do. She is plain but to him she is a beauty and not just a young inexperienced girl, but a clever, frank woman. It is hard for Jane Eyre to believe such things after hearing all her life that she is simple, plain and talentless. Journal Entry #8 â€Å"Prejudices, it is well known, are most difficult to eradicate from the heart whose soil has never been loosened or fertilized by education: they grow there, firm as weeds among stones.† -Chapter 29, page 518 Reaction: I thought the quote was a perfect description of what prejudice is and how it is even more difficult to combat when it is rooted with ignorance. Response: The quote was very strong and had a presence on the page. The metaphor made it all the more interesting and unique. Explanation: Jane knew that since Hannah was so old and uneducated she still had her old world views and prejudices of social class. Because of this, she didn’t think winning Hannah over was going to be an easy task. Journal Entry #9 â€Å"No oneShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Book The Castle Is A Veritable Prison, And I Am A Prisoner ! 1687 Words   |  7 PagesMore Journal Entries People me To Hayden Brown Dec 15 at 6:37 PM Citation Page Passage Commentary Page 12 â€Å"The Count halted, putting down my bags...† This shows how well Dracula treats him as Jonathan first arrives to the estate. Jonathan treats Dracula s castle as if is a hotel upon first arrival. I find it interesting how quickly he changes his view of the place later in the novel. Page 27 â€Å"The castle is a veritable prison, and I am a prisoner!† Jonathan obviously did not know what he was gettingRead MoreAn Analysis Of Charlotte Gilman s The Yellow Wallpaper Essay1624 Words   |  7 Pagesthe misadventures of orphaned Emily who is pursued and persecuted by a violent suitor, is often cited as a quintessential Gothic novel. However, elements of this genre can also be discerned in such renowned literary classics as Charlotte Brontà «Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s Jane Eyre (1847), with its Gothic setting, ghostly happenings, the brooding male protagonist, and the motif of the madwoman in the attic. It must be noted, however, that the female Gothic was a popular genre, which was not initially valued for its subversiveRead MoreThe Brontà « Family1804 Words   |  7 PagesAnne (Blom, 1977, p. 14). They had their Charlotte in 1816 and four years later moved to the isolated town of Haworth where the line of tragedies began. From the way that the children were raised Haworth, they learned how record their lives in a journal that would later be use d as reference to tell more about themselves. In this way, Patrick raised them with all the curiosity and intelligence it takes to be a successful writer. Patrick knew what it was like to be this successful writer becauseRead MoreSummer Reading2774 Words   |  12 Pagesresponse journals for each book (rubric attached). ïÆ'Ëœ Exams on the assigned novels within the first days of school. ïÆ'Ëœ In class essay questions on each of the novels. 9th Grade Regulars and Honors - Reading Assignment: 1. Fiction novel: The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkein *12 Dialectical Journal Entries 2. Nonfiction: A Walk Across America by Peter Jenkins *12 Dialectical Journal Entries 10th Grade Regular and Honors - Reading Assignment: 1. Fiction novel: Matched by Ally Condie *12 Dialectical Journal EntriesRead MoreShareholders Equity Quiz Questions 2014 ANS Essays2322 Words   |  10 Pageswere offered at $2.75 each, payable in full one month after acceptance. The offer closed on 31 May 2013 with 85% of the shareholders accepting. Shares were duly allotted on that date and all monies were received when due. Required Prepare journal entries to record these events, show all workings. (2 marks) Answer: Date Accounting Title Debit ($) Credit($) 31 May 2013 Cash Trust (25,000* 1/5*85%*2.75) Application 11688 11688 (money received on application hold in trust) 30 June 2013 Cash ApplicationRead MoreKate Bechdel s Fun Home Essay2365 Words   |  10 PagesShe first learns about lesbianism through text (â€Å"my realization†¦that I was lesbian came about in a manner consistent with my bookish upbringing†) and her journey towards discovering her sexuality is guided by these books. This, along with her diary journals, allows, at various parts of Fun Home, a different type of Alison at each stage in her life; this multiplicity in protagonists goes hand-in-hand with what Allen says about how intertextuality can alter the meaning of literature (Allen 160). In thisRead MoreLiterary Criticism : The Free Encyclopedia 7351 Words   |  30 PagesErziehungsroman (education novel) focuses on training and formal schooling,[citation needed] while a Kà ¼nstlerroman (artist novel) is about the development of an artist and shows a growth of the self.[16] Furthermore, some memoirs and published journals can be regarded as Bildungsroman although being predominantl y factual (an example being The Motorcycle Diaries by Ernesto Che Guevara).[17] The term is also more loosely used to describe coming-of-age films and related works in other genres. Examples[edit]Read MoreRise of the English Novel5132 Words   |  21 PagesAnn Radcliffe in 1794, Caleb Williams, written by William Godwin in 1794, and Melmoth the Wanderer, written by Charles Robert Maturin in 1820. Some authors even developed parodies to these novels. One example of this is Northanger Abbey, written by Jane Austen in 1818. In this novel, Austen directly refers to The Mysteries of Udolpho and excessively uses the â€Å"absurdities† that can be found within gothic novels. The development of the gothic novel also influenced an era of literature called the â€Å"VictorianRead MoreLeadership Development42674 Words   |  171 Pagesclassified as professionals , more than managers . †¢ Perren (2001) in survey for CEML of 149 professional bodies found that these bodies did see management and leadership as important, but that such skills are not often included in membership entry or CPD. Professional bodies in the fields of policy, administration and busi ness support (e.g. local government, information, personnel, purchasing and supply) placed higher value on management and leadership than bodies representing other fields ofRead MoreStatement of Purpose23848 Words   |  96 Pagespast summer I participated in a research project with a UNI professor, Dr. Augustine Osman. Our research involved the examination of the psychometric properties of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) in a community sample. I performed basic data entry and ran SPSS-X programs for manova, correlation, and reliability. For two to three hours a day, over an eight week period, my research experience involved discussions on issues of psychometrics as well as learning how Ohio Wesleyan University Writing

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Hume Essay Summary Example For Students

Hume Essay Summary Humes affirmation David Hume makes a strong affirmation in section IV of an Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hume states, I shall venture to affirm as a general proposition, which admits of no exception, that the knowledge of this relation is not, in any instance attained by reasonings a priori; but entirely from experience. In this statement, when discussing knowledge of this relation, Hume is referring to the relation between cause and effect. This argument can easily be dismissed as skeptical, for it puts all knowledge of this sort in doubt. However, Hume does not hastily doubt that this knowledge is not a priori, as a skeptic would. Instead Hume offers a sound argument as to why cause and effect knowledge can not be a priori, and thus his argument is not skeptical at all. Before Hume commits himself to this affirmation, he establishes several things first. He explains that all reasonings concerning matter of fact are founded on the relation of Cause and Effect. In support of this, Hume explains that, if asked, any man believing in a matter of fact would give as a reason in support of this fact, some other fact. It is from this that Hume concludes that all reasonings concerning fact are of the same nature. It is here that one continually assumes that there is a connection between the current fact and that, which is inferred from it. Furthermore, Hume states where there nothing to bind them together; the inference would be entirely precarious. Meaning, any matter of fact is supported only by another matter of fact, and if this connection is removed, one is left with a fact that is completely dependent. In addition, any fact will ultimately be dependent on a primary fact, which in turn is founded on cause and effect. It is only after Hume establishes this that he affirms that knowledge of this relation is never attained by reasonings a priori. Knowledge based on cause and effect, for Hume, relies entirely on human experience, and it is for this reason that it can not be a priori. Hume does not blindly state this proposition, he supports it with several examples that I find irrefutable. He suggests that no man when presented with gunpowder can imagine the explosion that can follow. The same is true when discussing the consequences of releasing a stone from ones hand. Without prior knowledge, it would be impossible to predict that the stone would fall to the ground. No object ever discovers, by the qualities that which appear to the senses, either causes which produced it, or the effects which will arise from it; nor can our reason, unassisted by experience, ever draw any inference concerning real existence and matter of fact. It is here that Hume proves that knowledge based on cause and effect relies solely on experience and can not be based on reasonings a priori. Knowledge that is a priori is the exact opposite of knowledge that is obtained through experience. For the very definition of a priori is knowledge that is presupposed as prior to experience. It is apparent, from Humes past arguments that certain things are impossible to know prior to experience. Hume applies this same reasoning to all the laws of nature, and all the operations of bodies. He states that it is the influence of custom to infer that anyone without prior knowledge, would be able to predict the communication of motion between one Billiard-ball to another upon impulse. Hume follows by stating, were any object presented to us, and were we required to pronounce concerning the effect, which would result from it, it would be impossible to do so, without consulting past observation. In all aspects of matter of fact, Hume has provided sufficient evidence, to support his affirmation. .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 , .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .postImageUrl , .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 , .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6:hover , .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6:visited , .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6:active { border:0!important; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6:active , .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6 .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua9ff5f29cbd8c70dd7906a19414565e6:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Republican Party Essay A skeptical argument is one in which everything is doubted. Hume is certainly not doubting everything when affirms that knowledge relating to cause and effect is never a priori. For it is in this same affirmation that he offers an alternate explanation to knowledge of this relation. Instead of solely doubting, as a skeptic would, Hume offers experience as an alternate explanation to the relation between matters of fact.

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Household Gods Essay Example For Students

Household Gods Essay Objective and subjective elements affect our daily motives and actions. Faith, a major concern, both subjective and objective, gives us the motivation to do right and live right. The poem Household Gods explores the vulnerability of faith used in poetry in levels of its objectivity and subjectivity. Through the perspective of an objective God, the poem perceives faith as an element, a component in our daily lives. Faith is portrayed as a God idolizing our desires and needs. On a daily basis, one may notice commoners praying towards idols of Gods for a better lifestyle, a better household or the fulfillment of a longing desire. This faith and trust represents subjective elements, whereas the idol represents God as an objective element. Hence, the faith turns into a value, a value that is brought home along with our various problems and issues. The poem Household Gods represents this ideology through the eyes of an idol. Written in the form of a Heroic quatrain, the poem addresses the profound issue of faith in God. With its basic four line stanzas the poet manages to use grand and elevated style of writing to portray the literal remorse tonality of the narrator, the idol God. Lines 1 and 2 I mirrored their breaking lives, I saw their pale Distraught coming and going, lined despair, represent this as the narrator, the God, takes responsibility for foreshadowing the fate of two people changing due to a rift in their relationship. The tone of the poem suggests a wistful and pensive mentality where the God questions his purpose in society, and whether foreshadowing human actions will give them any meaning for existence. The poets attitude towards the theme is emotional and more on a personal level which allows the readers to come in contact with the intrapersonal attitude of God and of their faiths. The tonality of the poem is aided by the rhythm of the poem, which alternates between emphasized, self-contained, one-line statements such as line 33: I see no more. Their life gave our lives meaning, The irregular punctuation and awkward short phrases used in the poem suggest a slow pace for the poem. In line 10 After a happy embrace, warmed my clay. the poet demonstrates an emotional sentiment of love and care through short phrasing where the sentence is divided into two parts breaking the flow of the idea. The attitude of the poem suggests a desire for valued attention, almost insecure of its presence as the poet appears to foreshadow circumstances that prove its insignificance in society. The last few lines contain a higher degree of remorse as its conclusive statement longs the presence of humans. The acceptance of their subjectivity at loss and the insecure attitude harmonizes with their lonely coexistence, decaying with the absence of human attention. Written in first person narrative point of view, the poet perceives the idea of human actions dependent upon idols such as the narrators kind. The first few lines display a sense of pity, as sense of reversed emotions that back track its way to the faults of the idol. It concerns its emotions with the humans it associates with, the humans who consider it as a housed God. The idol identifies his presence and his role in a family he is at home with. The narrator uses emotions of guilt and repression by playing the role of a submissive mirror who reflected the shattered lives of a once happy couple. The behaviors and actions that brought the couple and their faith together were mirrored by this idyllic God. In the same way the breaking apart of this relationship between two human beings and their God has made a major impression on their faith. The voice sends a dismissive and a tone of regret out to personify the idol who now shows a sense of shame as he mirrored the coming and going hu man bond. .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 , .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .postImageUrl , .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 , .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317:hover , .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317:visited , .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317:active { border:0!important; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317:active , .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317 .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua22fb85e19618840f72a18f5329a1317:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: ToK language essayThe poem also makes effective use in rhyme where a scheme of A-B-A-B is followed. Occasionally there are irregular rhyming words that elude the scheme. Feminine rhyme is used as the final syllable of the rhyme contains an unstressed syllable such as in street/feet and in ceiling/peeling. As the final syllable is unstressed, the rhyme tends to produce a falling away effect adding to the remorseful tone, as mentioned before. The rhyme affects the rhythm of the verse and this falling away effect is used the rhythm tends to have a sluggish flow. The rounded neatness in the rhyme scheme too adds to convey a sense of finality and atonement. The contention of this poem is to remind us of the central fact of our human existence, which is faith and belief. The poem intends to indicate our ignorant selves. In moments of intensity or crisis we are each of us along, separate and isolated, in our personal catastrophe, as demonstrated by the couple who have left each other and their faith due to their fated circumstances. Whether this is because we are basically indifferent and uncaring, or whether it is because such moments cannot possibly be shared anyway, is, perhaps, left open. The fact that the poem is written from the point of view of an idol, a god that was once worshipped and respected, provides a third account of the nature of human beings. In the second stanza, the idol speaks of the respect it once received from the woman. Moving forth, the idol also speaks of the vulnerability of love. Almost accusing them of breaking and sweeping away and leaving their faith without meaning. However, there is also a strong sense of inevitability in the poem that nothing can be done to change things, in the use of statements such as I gather myself to cough one cautious chime, But the works are rusted. Henceforth I am dumb. Perhaps the idol is merely describing the way things are in relation to its role in the society. Frequently, literature is effective when it contents itself with presenting issues rather than attempting glib or simplistic solutions. However, this piece of literature does present a conclusive argument where the connection between human and god is recognized. The poet concludes to say that the meaning of gods, faith, beliefs are all dependent on human beings. They are dependent on humans to give them meaning, to revive their existence as they coexist with our actions and emotions. People tend to be constrained by their faith yet committing to other various actions that come across their lives. Household Gods being a character that represents that faith, intended to portray the responsibility it carries of all human actions, as humans passively dedicate their lives unto their faith. It then carries all responsibility of the actions. The poem starts out to represent this insight. I mirrored their breaking lives I saw them. I was there. Hence it is evident that the first stanza claims responsibility of human actions. As the poem commences; first claiming responsibility then expressing selfish motives. The God mentions his presence in an emptied house, and the big impact it has left on it. The house where he was once worshipped, he once held power, is now dead without the presence of its followers. This is present in the line 24 Henceforth I am dumb. The line creates a return to the objective self of the idol. The idol was an object; it came alive with the coming together of two people, their beliefs, and their shelter that placed power upon the idol. This power was snatched away again by the human action of departure, that separated the bond between the two, leaving the idol an object once again. This cycle of our faith and values are portrayed through the selfish perspective of the idol. .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe , .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .postImageUrl , .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe , .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe:hover , .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe:visited , .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe:active { border:0!important; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe:active , .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u5386a3090bffb09dc019076ae359a9fe:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Metaphysical Poetry by Carlos Daniel Cervantes-Perez EssayThe poet succeeds in conveying the poets thoughts about the nature of human existence. The use of powerful, predominantly visual imagery of the emptied house adds to the heavy tone of the poem. The constant effects of rhythm and the use of pensive words complement the theme. The entire poem is locked in a cold and heavy tone and atmosphere. The difficulties in the poem lie in trying to assess what the narrator feels towards the subject, especially when he relates his purpose in existence to the existence of mankind. At times the poet seems to be relating the two forms of life together, with the implication that all life comes to such a fate. Or perhaps he is merely concerned with pointing out two different forms of existence. The nature of existence in the god is not condemned, in spite of its lonely disillusions. The detached phrasing manner of the poets presentation prevents the treatment from becoming completely sad or gloomy. In fact the poet pays tribute to the continuity and harmony of both their existence. This may be the key to the comparison with human life, and that of the gods, which struggles after illusions of progress and change and therefore loses the harmonious continuity of faith. Through such a piece of literature, one might need to confirm whether we are aware of our faith, or are they just bypasses to only mirror our actions. Self-indulged, we humans tend to forget the elements we believe in and put our faith upon? These are values that play an important role in our lives, yet are we are of it? The objectivity and the personification of the poem Household Gods bring about the sense of value and trust that we must all endure.